http://en.lichess.org/zZJIAj6K#19Computer says inaccuracy for 10.a3 But in his suggest I'm loosing my bishop after 11.Ng5
Is this analysis reliable? I saw some similar suggestions by this site's computer analysis system.
Sorry for bad English.
You don't lose your bishop, you can take the pawn d5 "en passant"
Selam onat sanırım şunu soruyorsun, stockfish'in 10. hamlede tavsiye ettiği 10.e5 Vd8 11.Ag5 ten sonra b5 oynarsa siyah ne olur ?
Vh5 ile mat istiyoruz, g6 sürüyor Vf3 ile tekrar mat istiyoruz Af6 oynuyor, bu atı alabileceğimiz gibi, şimdi Fxb5 aldığımızda filimizi cxb5 geri alırsa, Vxb7 ile biz de onun filini alabiliriz.
I think the answer is
e5 queen d8
knight g5 and if black plays b5
then knight e4 going for for the e6 square king check bishop double threat, so Its a knight maneuver.
Also in others variations its possible he might play rook b1.
Something like that
http://en.lichess.org/analysis/rn2k1nr/1b1p1ppp/1pp1pq2/4P3/p1B5/2PP1N1P/P1PB1PP1/R2Q1RK1_b_kq_-#6the analysis disappeared I cant post the analysis.
but the knight is going to the d6 square I think thats the machine idea, e6 I said before sorry, its d6.
yep, seems like my line ran into f5 and stockfish did all sorts of horrible things to me :D.
@Onat: abi benim anlattığıma f5 oynuyor bilgisayar ancak (Vh5 yerine) Ae4, Ad6 çatalı sayesinde gene alıyorsun siyahın filini