Search "user:AdityaNandan30"

It is easy if you are an intermidiate...............

@Sarg0n said in #14: > The shorter the time the better the Knights. I see....Thanks

@SamannOyB said in #18: > -> Bishops are stronger than knights, as they dominate a whole diagonal(if any). > -> Knights are more useful, for their checks cannot be shielded, and also they are very wic…

Using 2 Hands is an Illegal move.........

@Meriten said in #10: > In most games, 2 bishops are stronger than 2 knights or 1 knight and 1 bishop. Yeah...Btw it Depends....

@kindaspongey said in #9: > There are about fifty pages on knights and bishops in The Amateur's Mind by Jeremy Silman. > web.archive.org/web/20140708094419/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/ammind.pdf > w…

@Alientcp said in #8: > Both are very useful and their strengths vary according to the position. In a closed position, obviously the knight will shine, and in open positions, the bishop, by a wide mar…

@GIgAtTPoGi said in #6: > i think bishop more than Knight bc the bishop is strongest than knight you now why bc the bishop is checkmate in king the knight is little bit to checkmate the king :) Yeah y…

@TheKingClash said in #2: > Bishops in open games and endgames; Knights in closed games or in attack. Bishops in slow games and Knights in fast games. You too, Thanks

@Shadow1414 said in #3: > Thank You