Round 1, Match 67:
@Bugfish vs
@TKSBHMBenjaminAfter one month of notice for this match, the player
@TKSBHMBenjamin has been responsive, while
@Bugfish has not. If
@Bugfish does not respond within this forum by 4th April, this match will be ruled a forfeit decision in favour of
@TKSBHMBenjamin.
Round 1, Match 71:
@Orlando_Gloom vs
@thunderdog88After one month of notice for this match, the player
@Orlando_Gloom has been responsive, while
@thunderdog88 has not. If
@thunderdog88 does not respond within this forum by 4th April, this match will be ruled a forfeit decision in favour of
@Orlando_GloomRound 1, Match 76:
@kirekachesschamp vs
@OutOfFuelAfter one month of notice for this match, the player
@OutOfFuel has been responsive, while
@kirekachesschamp has not. If
@kirekachesschamp does not respond within this forum by 4th April, this match will be ruled a forfeit decision in favour of
@OutOfFuel.
Why is CWC so kind to unresponsive players? As far as I know, those matches should be scheduled by March 21 according to the schedule, it's already more than 10 days late. By normal rules (such as RKWC/AWC), those players should be simply forfeited without any more possible chances. Now it seems that they are given another chance without any punishments? For example, the player "B0N0B0" was unresponsive for the whole March, and can now get back into the tournament without any punishments? I don't think that's acceptable for his opponent.
@BotezGambit, thank you for your feedback. The preference is to see matches played. Multiple warnings are given to players with notice periods so that when forfeit decisions are made, they are usually fair. It would be unreasonable to raise a contest to a forfeit decision given that a generous number of opportunities have been provided.
That was just a rant because I personally hate those who don't obey the schedules. But I guess it's fine as long as everyone agrees with the rules XD
Round 1, Match 85:
@JohnStuckey vs
@qin_yixuan_eason22 During the course of the last month,
@JohnStuckey has been responsive. Only recently
@JohnStuckey indicated that
@Qin_Yixuan_Eason22 had been in touch via private messages with the view of playing very shortly. By 4th April, could each player please submit 3 dates with times and the corresponding time zone within this forum when they are each able to play. This match will either need to be played by 11th April, or else some form of forfeit decision will apply based on compliance to the above request in this forum.
@Mitrabha @JannLee The only days I cant play are monday, tuesday and thursday. I can play anytime after 14 UTC wednesday, friday, saturday or sunday
Round 1, Match 91:
@AmelyPlaying vs
@r2300 As
@r2300 is chat banned, this player has notified
@okei that the opponent
@AmelyPlaying has been contacted, but provided no response. During the last month, there has been on response from
@AmelyPlaying. If
@AmelyPlaying does not respond within this forum by 4th April, this match will be ruled a forfeit decision in favour of
@r2300.
Round 1, Match 106:
@medved9112 vs
@Jan2011After one month of notice for this match, both players have been responsive but have not been able to agree to a time. By 4th April, could each player please submit 3 dates with times and the corresponding time zone within this forum when they are each able to play. This match will either need to be played by 11th April, or else some form of forfeit decision will apply based on compliance to the above request in this forum.