Crazyhouse World Championship 2021 - Double Elimination Knockout Stage

Round 1, Match 29: @burpcow vs @sewak1999

After one month of notice for this match, the player @burpcow has been responsive, while @sewak1999 has not. Notice was provided to the player @sewak1999 to respond within this forum by 4th April which has not occurred. Therefore, this match has been ruled a forfeit decision in favour of @burpcow, who will next play against @okei.

Round 1, Match 46: @blunderman1 vs @v2chess

After one month of notice for this match, the player @blunderman1 has been responsive, while @v2chess has not. Notice was provided to the player @v2chess to respond within this forum by 4th April which has not occurred. Therefore, this match has been ruled a forfeit decision in favour of @blunderman1, who will next play against @retardedplatypus123.

Round 1, Match 67: @Bugfish vs @TKSBHMBenjamin

After one month of notice for this match, the player @TKSBHMBenjamin has been responsive, while @Bugfish has not. Notice was provided to the player @Bugfish to respond within this forum by 4th April which has not occurred. Therefore, this match has been ruled a forfeit decision in favour of @TKSBHMBenjamin, who will next play against @Simba7.

Round 1, Match 71: @Orlando_Gloom vs @thunderdog88

After one month of notice for this match, the player @Orlando_Gloom has been responsive, while @thunderdog88 has not. Notice was provided to the player @thunderdog88 to respond within this forum by 4th April which has not occurred. Therefore, this match has been ruled a forfeit decision in favour of @Orlando_Gloom, who will next play against @RoyalManiac.

Round 1, Match 76: @kirekachesschamp vs @OutOfFuel

After one month of notice for this match, the player @OutOfFuel has been responsive, while @kirekachesschamp has not. Notice was provided to the player @kirekachesschamp to respond within this forum by 4th April which has not occurred. Therefore, this match has been ruled a forfeit decision in favour of @OutOfFuel, who will next play against @emrty.

Round 1, Match 85: @JohnStuckey vs @qin_yixuan_eason22

During the course of the last month, @JohnStuckey has been responsive, while @Qin_Yixuan_Eason22 has not. Only recently @JohnStuckey indicated that @Qin_Yixuan_Eason22 had been in touch via private messages with the view of playing very shortly. However, @Qin_Yixuan_Eason22 did not show up for the match at the agreed time. There is already sufficient grounds to rule this match as a forfeit decision in favour of @JohnStuckey, who will next play against @Noober69.

Round 1, Match 107: @TroutFish vs @Om11

After one month of notice for this match, the player @Om11 has been responsive, while @TroutFish has not. Notice was provided to the player @TroutFish to respond within this forum by 4th April which has not occurred. Therefore, this match has been ruled a forfeit decision in favour of @Om11, who will next play against @pepellou.

Round 1, Match 121: @xuanet vs @SVANDAPRO

During the course of the last month, @xuanet has been responsive with regards to this particular match. We have seen some responses during the tournament duration from @SVANDAPRO, but not directly addressing this match with @xuanet. Notice was provided to the player @SVANDAPRO to respond within this forum by 4th April which has not occurred. Therefore, this match has been ruled a forfeit decision in favour of @xuanet, who will next play against @THE_COOL_GUY.

I am responsive
When can i play @outoffuel

@kirekachesschamp, as there is in fact no public forum post from @OutOfFuel here, I will be checking for any history of messages with the organiser team to ascertain if there is fair grounds to appeal this forfeit decision. At present, this result is back on hold, which has been updated on the bracket.